Tampilkan postingan dengan label kansas. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label kansas. Tampilkan semua postingan

Kamis, 11 Oktober 2012

Sam Donnellon: Bad rep music

options
 

IN ATLANTA last Friday, Braves fans littered the field after a bad call, forcing a long delay while groundskeepers cleaned the field not once, but twice.

In Kansas City last Sunday, Chiefs fans - estimates range from 700 to 70,000 - cheered when their own quarterback, Matt Cassel, left the game with a concussion.

Seattle fans cheered when the Yankees
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Seattle fans cheered when the Yankees' Alex Rodriguez suffered a broken wrist on a pitch in July.
1 of 3
Would it bother you if Michael Vick owned a dog?
Yes
No
Undecided
 
Get Your Philadelphia Sports Gear Here

    In June, two Dodgers fans were ordered to stand trial for brutally assaulting a Giants fan.

    In July, Seattle fans cheered as Alex Rodriguez lay in the batter's box writhing in pain, his wrist broken by a pitch.

    Geez, and they say we're nasty . . .

    There's nothing funny about beating someone because of the shirt he wore to a game. Nothing funny about cheering an injury to a player, home or away. As for the fans in Atlanta, my Lord, who knew they even had that in them? If these people hadn't stolen the Florida State Seminoles' chant years ago, they long ago might have been mistaken for, well, Kansas City fans.

    At least until Sunday.

    But that's an overgeneralization, and an overgeneralization - to steal the line uttered Sunday by Chiefs tackle Eric Winston - is "100 percent sickening."

    OK, not really. That's exaggerated outrage to make a point. Truth is, overgeneralizations make me laugh and should make you laugh, too, especially when they are sanctimonious attempts to defend what doesn't need defending: that an overwhelmingly large percentage of sports fans from these towns are decent, caring, supportive people.

    And if Winston had added that into his rant about his own fans after Sunday's game against the Ravens - as he did the following day - he might have been spared some of the municipally self-aggrandizing drivel that followed.

    "You cannot after a game in a highly emotional situation take your rant that way," Rich Baldinger, a former Chiefs player who now works for KCTV, said about Winston's criticism of Kansas City fans. "He came off wrong. You embarrassed a lot of great people in the city of Kansas City who have been so supportive of this team. You go to any other city and it's worse. These fans have been through thick or thin . . . Eric Winston, I think you owe these fans an apology. Because you cannot lump together everyone with a few you-know-whats out there, a few jerks who might have had one too many in the stands. So let's not put all these Kansas City fans together . . . Sometimes it's better to stop . . . "

    Better to stop what? Ranting about ranting?

    Baldinger, brother of our own Brian, should have stopped his own rant about Winston's rant after the third sentence, before the "any other city" line. Really? Charleston, S.C., is worse? San Antonio? St. Louis?

    I might have added Atlanta and Seattle but, well, you know . . .

    Instead he and co-host Michael Coleman ganged up on the easiest target available: little old us.

    "In Philadelphia, those fans, they embrace being called knuckleheads," asserted Coleman.

    "Exactly," said Baldinger.

    I have been called a knucklehead many times. I have called others it as well.

    Never was it embraced.

    And how did we get dragged into this anyway?

    "And that's what they're all about," continued the Baldy of the Midwest about his brother's current hometown. "But here people in Kansas City . . . they were hurt. It wasn't that they were upset, they were hurt. Because these people here consider you family. And remember what he said. He said there were 70,000 people. Buddy, you're 1-and-4 and there's 70,000 people in the stands. That shows me some support. Think about what you say before you say it."

    Exactly.

    I mean, categorizing an entire city one way because of the actions of a few is about as wrong as saying everyone at Arrowhead Stadium booed Matt Cassel on Sunday. Right, KC Baldy? I mean if you were trying to be funny, good on ya. But you sure seemed agitated.

    They ran a poll on the KCTV website, by the way. Of more than 12,000 respondents, 63 percent said Winston got it right. Which, misguided municipal slights aside, is just so wrong.

    Given a day to tone down his rhetoric, Winston did so.

    Page:   1  of  2   View All
    1 |   2       Next»

    Source : philly[dot]com

    Rabu, 10 Oktober 2012

    Paul Domowitch: Turnovers not only reason Birds aren't scoring

    options
     

    THE EAGLES' turnover problems have been dominating the conversation the last few days, and rightfully so.

    Just one team in the league - the 1-4 Kansas City Chiefs - has been more careless with the football in the first 5 weeks of the season than the Eagles, who already have 14 giveaways, 11 of them by quarterback Michael Vick.

    In related news, the Eagles are 31st in scoring, averaging a puny 16.0 points per game.

    "[The turnovers] are hindering our ability to score," coach Andy Reid said Monday. "It's keeping us down in that latter part . . . [we're] the second lowest-scoring team in the National Football League right now. We've got to make sure that we fix that."

    Yeah, that would be nice. But while Vick and Company's turnover problems certainly have been a big reason the Eagles have managed to score just eight touchdowns and 80 points in the first five games, it's not the only reason.

    You may recall that the Eagles had 38 turnovers last year, including nine in the red zone. Certainly unacceptable, yet they still managed to finish seventh in touchdowns (46) and eighth in scoring (24.8 points per game).

    So what else is going on here? Glad you asked.

    The long field

    The Eagles' average starting field position in the first five games has been their own 24.5-yard line, which is more than 4 yards worse than last year. By comparison, the Giants' average starting field position has been the 37.3.

    The two biggest reasons for the poor starting field position has been the lack of takeaways by the defense and the lack of production from the return game.

    While Juan Castillo's defense has held three of the first five opponents to 17 or fewer points, it has forced just three turnovers in the last four games since intercepting four passes against Cleveland in Week 1.

    The Eagles' punt- and kickoff-return teams have been equally unhelpful in giving the offense a running start. Through five games, they are 28th in the league in punt returns (6.0) and 30th in kick returns (19.6).

    Damaris Johnson has had just two punt returns longer than 6 yards. Brandon Boykin hasn't had a kick return longer than 29 yards, and none longer than 25 yards in the last three games.

    Just nine of the Eagles' 59 possessions this season have started beyond their own 35-yard line. By comparison, the Giants have had 18 of 46 possessions start at their own 36 or better.

    The Eagles have had just five possessions start in their opponents' territory, and two of those came at the end of their Weeks 1 and 2 wins over the Browns and Ravens, when they ran out the clock. They haven't started a drive on the other side of the 50 in the last three games.

    Most of their scoring drives have been cross-country trips. Just two of the Eagles' eight touchdown drives have been fewer than 70 yards, and just three of their 16 scoring drives (touchdowns and field goals) have been fewer than 55 yards.

    Lack of big plays

    The Eagles' opponents have done a good job of taking away the deep ball. They've had just two pass plays of 40-plus yards and 18 completions of 20-plus yards in their first five games. Last year, they finished with 10 40-plus-yard pass plays and 64 pass plays of 20 or more yards.

    "Listen, when you're playing good football teams, you're going to trade punches here," Reid said. "That's how this thing works. You might not get the big play. That might not happen."

    That said, 14 teams have given up three or more pass plays of 40-plus yards so far, including four of the Eagles' first five opponents: Cleveland (3), Baltimore (3), Arizona (4) and the Giants (4).

    According to Pro Football Focus, Vick is 17th in the league in passing on throws that have traveled 20 or more yards in the air. He has completed just eight of 22 such passes for 235 yards.

    Vick completed just three passes that traveled more than 10 yards in the air in Sunday's 16-14 loss to the Steelers. He had just twoe completions of more than 20 yards in the loss, a 23-yarder to DeSean Jackson in the second quarter that was followed by a 2-yard loss on a pass play to LeSean McCoy, an incompletion to Jeremy Maclin, a sack and a punt. In the fourth quarter, his 24-yard pass to Jackson set up the go-ahead touchdown.

    Now, you certainly don't have to be a big-play offense to be successful in the NFL. Eight of the 12 teams that made the playoffs last season had 11 or fewer pass plays of 40-plus yards. This season, 15 teams currently have the same or fewer 40-plus-yard pass plays as the Eagles, including the 4-1 49ers, Vikings and Bears and the 3-2 Patriots. The difference is that none of those teams has been as turnover-prone as the Eagles. So they're better equipped for double-digit-play scoring drives.

    Extra rushers

    Because of the Eagles' injury problems up front and because Vick has shown a susceptibility to the blitz in the past - 11 of his 14 interceptions last season came against the blitz - teams have been regularly sending extra rushers after him.

    Page:   1  of  2   View All
    1 |   2       Next»

    Source : philly[dot]com

    Selasa, 11 September 2012

    The Real Cost of Google Fiber

    Pre-registration for Google Fiber closed last week, with about 90% of Kansas City's eligible "fiber-hoods" rallying enough support for Google to build its infrastructure: it's on.

    Pre-registrants get seven years of slower broadband internet free (following a $300 construction fee). Or, with a 2-year contract for gigabit internet (1000 Mb/s) or Google's TV service bundle - both of which are priced competitively with rival plans - Google promised to waive the fee. And fully funded fiber-hoods get free gigabit internet at schools, hospitals and other public buildings.

    With stellar speed, dreamy prices and no sneaky equipment-rental fees, our initial report on Google Fiber was part glowing recommendation and part distilled envy.

    Alas, that ostensible absence of hidden fees is superficial. The service will still be priced as advertised, but the full cost of Google's fiber network won't be covered by billing and Google's capital investments alone.

    Kansas City taxpayers are helping Google develop its fiber network whether their neighborhoods will have access to it or not.

    The truth is, Kansas City promised numerous regulatory concessions and substantial subsidies in its bid to be Google Fiber's first home. Kansas City taxpayers (on both sides of the state line) are helping Google develop its fiber network whether their neighborhoods will have access to it or not.

    The development agreement between Google and Kansas City stipulates that "Google will bear all costs for the [Fiber] project." Yet it goes on to guarantee the company:

    • Free power
    • Free office space for Google employees
    • Expedited permits and inspections (with fees waived)
    • Free marketing, including direct mail
    • Free right-of-way easements (i.e. Google can build anywhere they want without compensating the city for noise or increased traffic)
    • The right to approve or reject any public statements the city makes about Fiber

    Now, those weren't preconditions for the agreement; Google may not have even suggested all of them. But the company did reject proposals from over a thousand other communities with more restrictive policies.

    Kansas City may not be footing the bill for Google's infrastructure outright, but they've suspended regulations and waived fees for Google and no one else. Did we mention that the city has never offered another ISP any of these incentives? How about that Google's exempt from standard open access regulations that would let competitors lease the city's only fiber network to offer competing services?

    Don't misunderstand: I'd gladly swap Comcast's stranglehold on my neighborhood for the benevolent monopoly Google is looking to build. Google's answer to the public interest concerns brought up by the Fiber program is that what it's offering is just better than everything else available. And that's pretty persuasive: Gigabit internet plus a free network box from Google would cost less than I pay now for 20Mb/s with a monthly usage cap.

    And, really, it's worth asking whether any city in the US will ever get better broadband without monopoly-enabling concessions much like Kansas City's. It's prohibitively expensive and risky for any ISP to make such huge infrastructure improvements - especially for an upstart with no existing customer base. Corporate favoritism may be backward, but it's ushering in Kansas City's cheap fiber internet future.

    Still, it's hard to see how crippling other ISPs' chances to compete, in service of a particular for-profit company, is even legal - let alone good for consumers. Google Fiber just isn't a free market success story, even if FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai (among others) seems to think so. There are lots of more accurate names for exceptional government treatment of corporate interests. None of them is very nice.

    Are Kansas City's concessions a dangerous precedent or the cost of doing business? Share your thoughts in the comments.

    Jon Fox is a Seattle hipster who loves polar bears and climbing trees. You can follow him on Twitter and IGN


    Source : feeds[dot]ign[dot]com