Tampilkan postingan dengan label sunday. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label sunday. Tampilkan semua postingan

Kamis, 11 Oktober 2012

The Walking Dead Producers Talk Season 3 and Introducing Michonne, The Governor, the Prison and More

With The Walking Dead returning for the much-anticipated Season 3 this Sunday, I recently had the chance to sit down with executive producers Robert Kirkman and Glen Mazzara to discuss what fans can expect this year.

Kirkman, the creator of The Walking Dead, and Mazzara, who serves as showrunner, talked about the introduction of key comic book elements this season, how the characters are evolving and much more.

For those who are super spoiler-phobic, no big twists and turns are revealed, beyond previously and officially revealed story elements of Season 3, though some basic plot details – and one cool zombie-visual -- from the season premiere are discussed.

IGN TV: How did you decide to do the time jump? Robert, you’ve about how, if you think about it, the first two seasons were pretty compressed, time-wise. This is a pretty big leap to make just as far as how much we’ve seen these people to this point.

Robert Kirkman: I know that one of the vehicles that come from television that I really like is the gap between seasons. I really love it when shows do that. I think The Sopranos did it really well. They were off the air for 18 months, and when they came back 18 months had passed in the lives of the characters. I think that’s a really cool thing. To me, it’s always fun to come in a little late in the game and see the characters in a much different light, and then spend the first episode going, “Oh, that’s what this person is doing now,” and, “Oh, they have this opinion now,” and, “Oh, these behaviors are a little bit different.” You know, it casts the characters in a bit of a different light. It also helps you separate things from season to season, which I think is really cool.

Glen Mazzara: Yeah, and I think it was important to show the effects of Rick’s leadership on the group. They’ve come together, they’re a tight-knit group -- that’s interesting. It was kind of exciting for us to advance the story and let the audience catch up. I guarantee people are going to say, “Are we ever going to see a flashback episode of what happened during the winter?” I’m going to go on record and say, “No. You’re seeing the story we want you to see, and this is part of a new story.” So we really wanted to advance things, move things forward and let the audience catch up.

IGN: Going in, you’ve got two characters that you’re introducing, both from the comics and both with a lot of expectations and a lot of popularity. On a visual level, Michonne is obviously matching with the comics much more than the Governor. How much did you debate did you have about how much you wanted to stick to the comics with those two characters?

Mazzara: First of all, we went with the best actors, who came in and really got the roles and got the characters and we’re very, very happy with the work that David [Morrissey] and Danai [Gurira] are doing. And they’ve added so much throughout the season. The question came up about Michonne’s iconic look, with the dreads, and that was something that was important to Robert - that she match the look of the character in the comic books. So we worked on that. Originally, I wasn’t so sure. I was afraid a wig might look fake. But we had conversations and experimented with the wig until it was to everybody’s satisfaction. We went ahead with it. With the Governor, he’s a developing character, so what you see is just what you’re getting now. But that’s a character that will continue to evolve and change, and we’ll see what happens with him. But that character did change in the comic book. People tend to forget that.

IGN: Robert, I’m sure it’s been funny for you to see that there can be super fans of the comic who are more precious about things being changed than you are and want everything to stay exactly the same. How do you go about making those decisions on what’s really important to you to look or stay the same, both visually or in other ways?

Kirkman: Yeah, I think it’s very important to recognize that the television show and the comic book series are two different things. I think that there are really cool, really memorable, really important moments from the comic book series that have existed over the life of it. There are some of those that I absolutely feel need to be adapted into the show in order for it to be a Walking Dead show, and there are other things that I think can be changed and should be changed. This is an adaptation, and keeping things fresh and lively and changing things up actually makes it better. I think that those diehard fans that are saying, “Oh, it’s not exactly like the comic. I want the exact same stuff,” I think they would be bored with the show if they had gotten their wish. I think it’s very important to add new material to this and make it as exciting as possible, just because the comic book is exciting and new. That’s one of its charms.

IGN: The first two seasons have a lot about Shane versus Rick and their differing styles of leadership. Now we’re going into this new season and Shane is out of the picture, but Rick has changed himself. At the place he is now, how does his style of leadership match or not match the Governor?

Mazzara: That’s a great question. I think Rick is initially a lot more honest than the Governor. I think the Governor is playing a game and a long con. He has an ultimate agenda that’s very important to him. Rick’s face is sort of pressed right up against the glass, and he has very immediate needs of keeping this group alive, finding a safe place, preparing a safe place where his wife can have a baby so that when the baby’s born, everyone’s safe -- they’re not out on the open road and the crying baby isn’t summoning walkers -- this is what he’s thinking about, the problems at hand. The Governor’s looking down the road a little bit more.

IGN: Some fans weren’t in love with Lori last season. Can you talk a bit about Rick and Lori and what their dynamic is like this season? Can they get past all that’s happened at this point?

Mazzara: That’s something that will unfold this season, their relationship. That’s something that’s important to them. I don’t think there’s been any time while they’re out on the road where they could push in and spend time with each other and work out their problems. That’s what she’s saying when we meet her in the season premiere. So I think Rick’s job is to find a safe place for her to have the baby. Then he’s probably thinking they can deal with this problem. But, you know, it’s business first. So Rick’s using life on the road, in a way, as an excuse to avoid repairing his marriage. They’re in conflict, and I think both actors have done a great job of really making you feel like you’re watching a marriage in distress in the middle of a zombie apocalypse. This year, I really think you’ll really feel sympathetic for both characters.

Kirkman: I think one cool element of this season that we’re going to be exploring throughout is the fact that these are two people that are a married couple, who may just need to take a break. They have come at an impasse in their marriage, they have both definitely done things that the other is not very happy about, but they can’t really do the things that we would do in this world -- step back, try and figure out if we want to stay with this person and what our relationship is actually built on. These people are forced to live together in order to survive. They’re basically on top of each other at all times and not able to deal with their issues. That’s something we’ll be dealing with a lot moving forward.


Source : feeds[dot]ign[dot]com

Rabu, 10 Oktober 2012

Eagles' Vick improving against the blitz

options
 

Lost in the uproar over Michael Vick's two fumbles on Sunday was a second straight strong performance from the quarterback against the blitz.

His 11 turnovers this season have dominated the conversation after the Eagles' 16-14 loss in Pittsburgh - and rightfully so. But Vick's improvement when facing additional pass rushers has largely gone unnoticed.

Michael Vick looks for a receiver while running back Bryce Brown (right) tries to keep the Steelers
Michael Vick looks for a receiver while running back Bryce Brown (right) tries to keep the Steelers' Lawrence Timmons away from him during the Eagles' loss in Pittsburgh. RON CORTES / Staff Photographer
1 of 2
Would it bother you if Michael Vick owned a dog?
Yes
No
Undecided

Andy Reid has noticed. He must if he is to focus on the positive in light of his quarterback's turnover woes. But Vick's numbers against the blitz in the last two games are so different from the first three that it suggests a progression that is no fluke.

"You saw it in this past game," Reid said Wednesday as his Eagles prepared for Sunday's home game against the Detroit Lions. "They blitzed us on some of the plays in that long drive we had, in some cases zero blitzes where they brought everybody they could bring, and still covered the guys who were eligible. He did well against those."

The Steelers blitzed Vick 17 times on 36 drop-backs. When they came with extra rushers, he completed 11 of 15 passes for 123 yards and two touchdowns. He did not toss an interception but was sacked twice.

The week before against the New York Giants, his numbers against the blitz were equally as good - 8 of 12 for 125 yards, a touchdown, and no interceptions. Vick's combined numbers against the blitz in the last two games computed to a 136 passer rating.

He had very little success against the blitz to open the season and struggled immensely against the Cardinals in Week 3. Vick completed only 18 of 46 passes for 337 yards against the blitz in the first three games. He did not throw a touchdown or an interception and was sacked six times.

Both of his fumbles in Arizona came against the blitz, the second near the goal line when safety Kerry Rhodes rushed from the slot and pummeled an unsuspecting Vick. The fumble was returned for a touchdown.

The Eagles offense's inability to adjust in that game made it all but certain that opposing defensive coordinators would continue to dial up blitzes until Vick figured out how to make their defenses pay.

"It's been productive. It's something that my coaches have really harped on," Vick said. "But it's like you accomplish one thing [and] you don't want to take a couple of steps back and have to start at ground zero because of ball security."

The strides Vick has made against the blitz have been overshadowed by his fumbles. He has a league-high eight (five lost) this season and is the NFL's active leader in career fumbles (84) and fumbles lost (39).

Sunday's lost fumbles, however, were of great concern because Vick did not take bone-jarring hits like the one he took from Rhodes.

"He'll fix it," Reid said. "He'll get it taken care of."

He'd better. Just as defenses will send extra pass rushers at Vick until he improves against the blitz, defenders will make the extra effort to strip the football from his seemingly loose handle.

"I expect everybody that gets close to me to be reaching for the football," Vick said. "It's totally my responsibility to take care of the ball and move on, especially for the sake of this football team. It's something I've got to get corrected."

Reid has said the team always works on protecting the ball in practice. But quarterbacks are off limits in terms of contact during the workweek. Vick was asked if there was anything additional he could do to ward off fumbles.

"You have some drills you can create. We have a drill that we do," Vick said. "But it's just being out there on the field. You've got to be able to take care of the ball within the moment."

That isn't necessarily true with the blitz. While it's difficult to simulate an opposing defense, the Eagles still practice endlessly on facing various blitz packages. Vick said most of the work, however, has been done in the classroom watching film.

"I'm proud of that because I was like last in the league last year," Vick said of his 65.5 passer rating against the blitz in 2011. "Throughout my career I've been not so good against the blitz. Now it's starting to pay off, and that's from understanding protections and knowing when one guy is coming free."


Contact Jeff McLane at jmclane@phillynews.com

or on Twitter @Jeff_McLane.


Source : philly[dot]com

Jumat, 14 September 2012

Sheamus: Lawler's Heart Attack Was a "Real Fright"

This Sunday, the WWE holds its annual Night of Champions pay-per-view - a night where every single WWE title is on the line. CM Punk will defend the WWE Championship against John Cena, Kofi Kingston and R-Truth will defend the WWE Tag Team Titles against Kane and Daniel Bryan and World Heavyweight Champion Sheamus will face down Alberto Del Rio once last time.

I had a chance to talk to Sheamus about his upcoming title match with Del Rio, their lengthy feud, his porcelain-white skin, and last Monday's frightening RAW from Montreal where Jerry Lawler suffered an on-air heart attack. Sheamus, among others, was one of the WWE Superstars who had to head out the ring and perform while EMTs were working to revive Lawler backstage.

IGN: This will be the third pay-per-view in a row where you've defended your title against Alberto Del Rio. That doesn't happen very often in modern wrestling. Can you talk a little about this feud?

Sheamus: [laughs] Is it the third pay-per-view already? Time flies, Matt. It really does when you're having fun. Yeah, it rarely happens, as you said. This feud actually started off back after WrestleMania when Del Rio, who had been out for quite a while, came back and started to interrupt me when I was the new World Heavyweight Champion. But it's been a really cool thing for me, and a good feud for me, because we learn a lot from each other in the ring and it keeps going back and forth. I even got to drive around in a Ferrari, which was a lot of fun. [laughs] It sure beat my Hyundai that I had back in Dublin. But this feud's been good for both of us, since both of us were sort of in the same boat when we came to WWE. We both found success rather quickly here. I became WWE Champion back in '09 and Del Rio won the Royal Rumble and Money in the Bank and became WWE Champion himself so these matches have been about two guys who rose up the ranks very quickly. I've enjoyed it. I've enjoyed the way the storyline's progressed. With each one of us constantly trying to get the better of the other, and out-do each other over the past couple weeks.

IGN: Now, for your match on Sunday at Night of Champions, the Brogue Kick has been banned. But you have more finishers than anyone else in the company. When will you have enough finishers, sir?

Sheamus: [laughs] I really don't know, man. I'm like a kid in a candy store. You can never have too many finishers. I think Undertaker has 17. The thing about the Brogue Kick though, and why it's caught on, is that it's something that I've really tried to establish over the past three years. It's a great finisher that can come out of nowhere. That's a rare thing in the WWE. John Cena obviously comes to mind too. He can literally pick up a crane and hit the AA. We've seen him use it on Big Show and the like. Randy Orton's RKO is like that too. It's been so successful because can come out of nowhere. And the Brogue Kick is kind of the same way. It can take down anyone, anywhere no matter their size. I've got other finishers, yeah, but that's really my main move. But I'll just have to figure out another way to beat Del Rio. The Cloverleaf's new and it's been very successful as of late so I might go for that one.

IGN: What did you think about the segment from a few weeks ago when Punk called the World Heavyweight Title the #2 belt in the company?

Sheamus: You know, it's funny that came up because we were all doing a THQ event back in Los Angeles during SummerSlam and it was a roundtable discussion group for the WWE 13 game and Jim Ross talked about the WWE Championship is and how important it is to the business. And how it was the one. And it just reminded me of how important the World Heavyweight Championship is to me. And how it's just as important in the company. I don't see how Punk can call the World Heavyweight Championship a secondary because in my opinion, from what I've seen, people like Flair, Undertaker, Edge, Triple H, John Cena and even Punk himself have held this championship. And this championship was the one attached to RAW if you just look back a couple of years ago. So I don't believe that. I also object to the fact that Punk calls himself the "Best in the World" even though he's never faced me. Until he's beaten me, I don't think he can call himself the best champion or the "Best in the World."

Sheamus talks the burdens of being so pale, and Jerry Lawler's heart attack on RAW, on page 2...


Source : feeds[dot]ign[dot]com